Western Sydney Rail
7:12 pmWhile thinking about the second harbour crossing blog, I was conscious of how the changes within the Sydney CBD would affect rail alignments in western Sydney. The current government proposal has no consideration for express services to the CBD, and obviously building the NWRL as a metro line with a smaller diameter tunnel will significantly limit the flexibility of future rail projects.
To design the best solution for the harbour crossing, I have also considered how the existing network could be reconfigured to improve rail transportation in western Sydney. The premise for this design is connecting the existing city centres to crate a networked typology, that is a rail network that allows passengers the flexibility of traveling within and between urban centres throughout the metropolitan area, without the need to travel through the Sydney CBD. Connecting city centres will increase peak and off-peak rail usage as people living in higher density centres will be able to travel throughout Sydney without the need for a car. It will also provide residents in the west and south west easier access to jobs in the north and northwest.
The first diagram below shows the existing disjointed rail alignments in western Sydney. With the exception of the poorly serviced Cumberland line, all these alignments are focused on transporting passengers to the Sydney CBD.
Making Parramatta the centre of the rail network in western Sydney will promote Parramatta as the second Sydney CBD. The improved accessibility to jobs and workers will significantly increase private investment and deliver more jobs and better paying jobs to western Sydney.
The map below shows the possible rail alignments through the Parramatta CBD.
3 comments
I think this is a fantastic proposal. Western Sydney seems to have a significant number of rail lines that just don't really go anywhere which your proposal solves quite simply.
ReplyDeleteMy only question is, what is the benefit of having the redesigned Carlingford line trains loop round and connect to the Northern line and head south? Would it not be better to have the line use the upper Northern line connecting Parramatta to Hornsby? Or to terminate services at Epping and reunite the Upper and Lower portions of the Northern line?
Cheers
I agree, there is no benefit in looping the Carlingford line back down the Northern line, it would be better to terminate the PERL at Epping.
ReplyDeleteThis idea for the PERL is dependant on the Moorebank intermodal terminal being built and closing down the intermodal terminal at Fairfield. Freight can then be moved to the south west freight line.
ReplyDelete